• Home
  • Technical Writing
  • Writing Bombshells

Sandra’s Miscellany

Writing in all its forms

Feed on
Posts
Comments

Pride and Prejudice

Nov 19th, 2005 by Sandra

Some writing buddies and I went to the Angelika Film Center yesterday to see the Pride and Prejudice matinee. It seemed like a great idea — go to the fancy-schmancy theater, avoid the crowds (who bothers to go to the movies downtown?), and enjoy the film. But I was disappointed to see that the Angelika is suffering already — broken seat arms and stained fabric. We were the only people in the theater, which was great, but from the periodic rythmic thudding up and to our right, the construction team installing a new store just outside felt it necessary to fire up the old jackhammer to complete their task.

As for the film itself, it was a lovely, sensitive, beautifully shot movie that was almost — almost — satisfying.


***** SPOILER ALERT BEGIN *****

The main problem was that a vital subplot was hugely reduced to make room for Lizzie and Darcy’s story. That would have been successful had not so much of Lizzie’s change of heart not depended on the betrayal of Wickham. When Wickham ran off with Lydia, he didn’t just betray the Bennets; he betrayed Lizzie because he had flirted with her so heavily. It was clear both in the book and in the definitive BBC version that Wickham had come very close to courting Lizzie, that the only thing holding him back from offering for her was his financial position, and that Lizzie was entirely sold on his charm and openness and apparent integrity. This latest version of the story gives us a glimpse of the flirtation, but not of Lizzie’s growing devotion to Wickham. Of course Lizzie would never actually marry Wickham — in the final analysis, even were he a “good guy,” he wouldn’t be enough for her — but it’s imperative that we believe his abduction of Lydia is a blow to Lizzie on a personal as well as familial level.

One of the reasons Darcy looks so honorable in the end is because Wickham looks so bad. When Wickham’s ill deeds all occur off-stage, and when we don’t have a real sense of Lizzie’s affection for him, then Lizzie’s remorse over having misjudged Darcy falls short emotionally. She needs that very personal shock to make her aware that Darcy would never do what Wickham has done, and to elevate Darcy in her esteem.


***** SPOILER ALERT END *****

Overall, I loved the movie, though. It doesn’t bother me one whit that Keira is her generation’s Audrey Hepburn (and therefore much more beautiful than Elizabeth Bennet) when she can bring such liveliness and spark to the character. I loved the dirtiness and grime, the crush of the balls, the hair falling from pins, the sweat, the fact the actors looked like they’d been taught to dance by relatives rather than choreographers. I loved that Matthew MacFadyen played Darcy as socially awkward rather than haughty, and let his arrogance arise from his discomfort rather than disdain for those “lesser” than he. (This was one problem I had with Colin Firth’s performance — Darcy’s arrogance was aggressively projected out toward others rather than used as a defense mechanism.)

Loved it and want to see it again.

Posted in Living | 4 Comments

4 Responses to “Pride and Prejudice”

  1. on 19 Nov 2005 at 8:11 pm1Laura

    I hated that I had to miss it. But remember when I said I could have made it if I were *cough* sick? I ended up sick yesterday and got sent home from work. Gotta be careful what you “wish” for.

    As for the P&P viewing, I’m a virgin all the way. Haven’t even read the book yet. I’m adding it to my Christmas time reading though. There’s been so much hype about it (not in relation to this movie) in the last year, I’ve got to see what I’m missing. :o)

    Glad you had a good time and enjoyed it.

  2. on 19 Nov 2005 at 8:19 pm2Sandra

    You have such a treat in store for you, Laura! I really do envy folks who haven’t seen or read the book. I’d love to read it again for the first time.

    I’m going to arrange another GMO, too, so keep your eyes peeled for another e-mail from me about that. I’m hoping it’ll open at more theaters here over Thanksgiving, so we can meet down in the Webster area rather than have to drive into town.

  3. on 26 Nov 2005 at 8:22 am3Karmela Johnson

    Okay, I just saw it and must say that I am now a Matthew McFayden fan. Where has this man been all my life? Wow, you know that last scene when he’s trudging through the field in the early morning hours with his coat billowing about him Matrix-style? Sigh… All men, when about to woo a woman who’s on the fence, should all go and buy themselves an ankle-length Matrix-style coat for maximum wooing effect. Why did I ever think this man wasn’t hot?

    As for the rest of the movie? I agree and double-agree with your analysis, although it didn’t bother me about the minimizing of the Wickham subplot. That was always my least favorite part of the book.

    Me wanna see it again too!

  4. on 27 Nov 2005 at 11:43 am4Sandra

    Hey Karmela, thanks for dropping in! You are totally right about the Matrix cloak. You know who looked great in a cloak? Joseph Fiennes in The Merchant of Venice. He could wield a cloak like nobody’s business.

    Well, I have to revise some of my comments about the Wickham subplot. I just reread P&P again, and Wickham’s dastardly deed didn’t actually have as much to do with Lizzie’s change of heart as I thought. Lizzie was over Wickham by the time she learns of his checkered past.

    BUT, the general gist — that Lizzie becomes fully aware of Darcy’s honorable nature while examining Wickham’s dishonorable one — still remains. It’s a pretty clever move on Jane’s part, actually, setting up these two opposites who have one point around which they both turn (the attempted seduction of Georgiana), and which serves to influence the heroine so strongly. Very, very clever.

  • Recent Posts

    • Moonlight and Magnolias
    • Tilting at windmills
    • The sound of silence
    • Closed!
    • Without a Trace soundtrack
    • 100 words for 100 days
  • Archives

    • October 2007 (1)
    • August 2007 (5)
    • July 2007 (4)
    • May 2007 (2)
    • March 2007 (8)
    • February 2007 (2)
    • January 2007 (3)
    • December 2006 (2)
    • November 2006 (5)
    • October 2006 (4)
    • September 2006 (7)
    • August 2006 (12)
    • July 2006 (9)
    • June 2006 (2)
    • May 2006 (6)
    • April 2006 (1)
    • March 2006 (7)
    • February 2006 (1)
    • January 2006 (4)
    • December 2005 (3)
    • November 2005 (7)
    • October 2005 (7)
    • September 2005 (18)
    • August 2005 (5)
  • Categories

    • Bombshells (25)
    • Living (49)
    • Writing (58)
    • Reading (5)
    • Athena Force (3)
    • Tech Writing (4)
    • Movie reviews (1)
  • Pages

    • Technical Writing
      • RoboHelp tips
        • Calling WebHelp from a Web Page
      • The RUP Factor
        • Getting Educated
    • The Orchid Hunter
    • Writing Bombshells
      • 1. Beauty and the bitch
      • 2. Less than hero
      • 3. It's curtains for all of us
      • 4. Take that!
      • 5. So yell, why dontcha?

Sandra’s Miscellany © 2008 All Rights Reserved.

MistyLook made free by Web Hosting Bluebook